Midrange or Situation-Specific Nurse Theories
Midrange or Situation-Specific Theories 2 2 unread replies. 2 2 replies. Points: 20 Due: Day 3 and Day 6 Directions: Select one midrange or situation-specific theory that is congruent with your clinical nursing practice. Explain how it is congruent to your clinical nursing practice. Give an example, including rationale, of how your example is congruent to your own clinical nursing practice. Introduce a research source article of your choosing in the discussion that either uses a theory congruent with your practice or one which one could easily apply this theory to and explain why. Post your original response by the end of Day 3. Then, by the end of Day 6, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. Please Note: You will not be able to delete or revise a post after you submit it. It would be in your best interest to spend a couple of minutes reviewing your post before submitting. You will not be able to see anyone else’s posts until you post first. As soon as you submit a post, you will be able to view everyone else’s posts. Mid-Range Theory Articles Adams, L. (2017). Peplau’s contributions to psychiatric and nursing knowledge (PDF). Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Nursing, 1(1), e10–e18. Bittencourt, M. N., Marques, M. I. D., & Diniz de Andrade Borroso, T. M. M. (2018). Contributions of nursing theories in the practice of the mental health promotion (PDF). Revista de Enfermagem Referencia, 4(18) 125–132. Cabrera, J. P. (2018). Maternal role attainment theory: Promoting maternal Identity and family health (PDF). International Journal of Childbirth Education, 33(2), 21–23. Davidson, J. E. (2010). Facilitated sensemaking: A strategy and new middle-range theory to support families of intensive care unit patients (PDF). Critical Care Nurse, 30(6), 28–39. Jaarsma, T., Cameron J., Riegel, B., & Stromberg, A. (2017). Factors related to self-care in heart failure patients according to the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness: A literature update (PDF). Current Heart Failure Reports, 14, 71–7 Discussion Board Rubric B Standard Discussion Board Rubric B Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Initial Post: Relevance to the Topic of Discussion 6.0 pts The posting directly addresses key issues, questions, or problems related to the topic of discussion. The posting applies course concepts with examples showing applied knowledge and understanding of topic with appropriate use of at least two citations/references. Post has been submitted by the due date. (6 points) 5.0 pts The posting has not fully addressed the question(s) or problems related to the topic. And/or no citations/references are used. And/or initial posting is not submitted by the due date. (3-5 points) 2.0 pts The posting does not directly address the question or problem posed by the discussion and/or no initial discussion post will result in a zero. (0-2 points) 6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Initial Post: Insight and Application of Course Concepts 6.0 pts The posting offers original and thoughtful insight, synthesis, or observation that demonstrates a strong understanding of the concepts and ideas pertaining to the discussion topic (use of examples). Use at least two appropriate citations/references to support all claims and facts. (6 points) 5.0 pts The posting presents minimal insight, analysis, or observation to the topic presentation (no examples of applicability or detailed discussion). Appropriate use of citations/references to support presenting ideas. And/or no use of citations/references. (3-5 points) 2.0 pts The posting does not offer any significant insight, analysis, or observation related to the discussion topic. And/or no initial discussion post will result in a zero. (0-2 points) 6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Peer Responses: Number of Responses 4.0 pts Two peer responses are provided with at least one peer response that has a citation/reference; each posted on a different day from each other and from the initial posting. (4 points) 3.0 pts Minimum number of responses is not posted and/or no citation/reference is used and/or all postings are made on the same day. (1-3 points) 0.0 pts No peer responses are posted and/or responses are posted after the due date. (0 points) 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Peer Responses: Quality of Response Posts 4.0 pts The response is a substantive interaction that builds on the discussion question and ideas of others while using course content with appropriate citation/references. Post is made by the due date. (4 points) 3.0 pts The response is somewhat substantive and includes appropriate citations/references and/or no citation/reference is used. (1-3 points) 0.0 pts The response is not substantive and does not build on the ideas from weekly objectives and required readings, nor does it include a citation/reference. Or no response to peer by due date. (0 points) 4.0 pts Total Points: 20.0
Our experts will write you a top-quality paper and revise it an unlimited number of times until you're 100% satisfied - or offer a refund.