NURS 8300 Week 5: Measuring Quality Assignment
NURS 8300 Week 5: Measuring Quality Assignment
NURS 8300 Week 5 Assignment 1: Measuring Quality
Continue to work on this Assignment, assigned in Week 3 and due by Day 7 of this week.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name
- Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 5 Assignment You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submitbutton to complete your submission.
NURS 8300 Week 5 Assignment 1: Measuring Quality Grading Criteria
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
NURS 8300 Week 5 Assignment 2: Major Assessment 6
This Assignment requires completion of 13 IHI Open School modules and the completion of the Certificate of Completion Basic level. There are 13 modules which you must complete over the course of these 11 weeks. While they are learner paced it is to your advantage to complete the modules in the week assigned as the content of the course is related to the modules.
To earn the 30 points associated with this application, you must complete all 13 modules and earn the certificate of completion. Partial credit is not permitted.
Week 5 IHI Open School Modules
- QI 104: The Life Cycle of a Quality Improvement Project
- QI 105: The Human Side of Quality Improvement
There is nothing to submit this week.
Please save the certificate you receive upon completion. You will be required to upload this to gradebook in evidence of your completion. NURS 8300 Week 5: Measuring Quality Assignment
NURS 8300 Week 5 Assignment 1: Measuring Quality Week in Review
This week you evaluated how quality metrics drive change to create improvement in the management of chronic diseaseNext week you will critique quality improvement models and tools utilized within the models and apply this knowledge in an authentic setting by planning a quality improvement project.
NURS 8300 Week 5: System Management of Populations
As noted in previous weeks, quality improvement measures are implemented at the macro and micro levels. Using quality indicators and measures, health care providers can compare, evaluate, and identify areas that need improvement to ensure quality care. How do these measures compare when managing chronic illnesses? The Resources from Week 1 revealed that many Americans do not receive quality health care for chronic illnesses, resulting in patients having more than one chronic illness (Institute of Medicine, 2001). How can nurses engaged in advanced practice evaluate the issues around treating chronic illness? How do quality metrics for managing chronic disease improve its management?
Keep your responses to these questions in mind as you proceed through this week, which calls attention to how quality metrics drive change to improve population health through the management of chronic disease.
This week you examine quality metrics pertaining to the management of chronic illness in various health care settings. NURS 8300 Week 5: Measuring Quality Assignment
By the end of this week, you will be able to:
- Evaluate how quality metrics drive change to create improvement in the management of chronic disease
Photo Credit: [Dimitri Otis]/[Digital Vision]/Getty Images
Reference: Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/waldenu/docDetail.action?docID=10032412
NURS 8300 Week 5 Assignment 1: Measuring Quality Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Joshi, M.S., Ransom, E.R., Nash, D.B., & Ransom, S.B., (Eds.). (2014). The Healthcare Quality Book, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: Health Adminisration Press
- Chapter 10: “Dashboard & Scorecards: Tools for Creating Alignment”
Butcher, L. (2011). High standards. NCQA-approved practice a test for value-based care. Modern Healthcare, 41(11), 40. Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. In this article, an oncology practice is recognized by the National Committee for Quality Assurance. Although the practice has seen a decrease in patients due to cost increases, the quality of care has increased significantly. The practice is serving as a model for other oncology practices.
McKinney, M. (2010). Quality, not quantity. Costliest care not the best, says NCQA report. Modern Healthcare, 40(42), 8–9. Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. This article analyzes the findings of the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s State of Health Care Quality report and concludes that there is no correlation between spending and quality within health care organizations. NURS 8300 Week 5: Measuring Quality Assignment
Reprinted by permission via the Copyright Clearance Center.
NURS 8300 Week 5 Assignment 1: Measuring Quality Optional Resources
Wolfenden, J., Dunn, A., Holmes, A., Davies, C., & Buchan, J. (2010). Track and trigger system for use in community hospitals. Nursing Standard, 24(45), 35–39. NURS 8300 Week 5: Measuring Quality Assignment
Comparing types of Quality Metric for Managing Chronic Diseases that applies to Hospital and Home Settings
Diabetes mellitus is a public health crisis and is associated with many chronic diseases that impose substantial health care and social expenditures. It is becoming concerning because of it’s rising despite all efforts to manage the disorder. It is one of the top 10 leading causes of death in the United States and affects almost 26 million Americans. Diabetes is a serious, common, costly, yet manageable disease that causes many preventable but devastating complications Diabetes is a significant public health problem, and its management is complex. Patients with diabetes are usually required preventive management such as annual foot and eye exam, kidney function test, physical exercise, dietary modification, smoking cessation and weight loss (Buttar, Trybulski, Polgar-Bailey, & Sandberg-Cook, 2013). My organization utilizes the Joslin Clinical Analytic Tool (JCAT) to measure the management of diabetes. JCAT provides a roadmap to improvement and helps providers to measure the effectiveness of care, identify gaps in earlier treatment, and implement changes when appropriate to reduce complications and improve patient outcomes (Joslin Diabetic Center 2018). Providers use JCAT to set the benchmark for diabetes care and treatment. Other facilities use the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) to measure quality care related to many significant public health issues, such as cancer, heart disease, smoking, asthma, and diabetes, but it does not adjust for patient mix, nor reflects recent clinical trials that support individualized goals (AJMC, 2016).
Quality Metrics in Improvement of the Management of Chronic Disease
The National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) and The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) assess quality metrics used by an organization with the purpose to improve the quality of healthcare. Presently, most healthcare facilities are using HEDIS to measure quality of diabetes care. However, JCAT is developed to address the deficiency of HEDIS. It focuses on data from five areas which include glycemic control, blood pressure, lipid, renal function, and smoking to generate scores. Those specific areas for intervention are likely to be the most effective in improving health outcomes and reducing the cost of care. It accurately spots the addressable gaps and recognizes those who need targeted quality interventions (Joslin Diabetic Center, 2018).
Trigger Systems to Help Manage Patient Safety.
Hospitals use various strategies to detect adverse events or safety issues for patients. Some of these systems are very effective as compared to the others. The retroactive random trigger consists of reviewing patient’s records and reviewing prescription and clinical data from patient chart or EHRs, which include but not limited to vital signs, blood glucose levels, and A1C. Such triggers can be reactive to managing diabetes, but proactive in preventing complications. NURS 8300 Week 5: Measuring Quality Assignment
AJMC, (2016). Measuring the Quality of Diabetes Care. Retrieved from http://www.ajmc.com/journals/evidence-based-diabetes-management/2016/march-2016/measuring-the-quality-of-diabetes-care
Buttar, T.M., Trybulski, J., Polgar-Bailey, P., & Sandberg-Cook, J. (2013). Primary Care: A Collaborative Practice, (4th Ed.). St Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
Joslin Diabetic Center, (2018). Joslin Diabetes Center launches pilot of JCAT™ quality analysis tool at Truman Medical Centers. Retrieved from http://www.joslin.org/news/Joslin-launches-JCAT%E2%84%A2-quality-analysis-tool-at-truman-medical-centers.html
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). (2014). Healthcare effectiveness data and information set (HEDIS). Retrieved from http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/59/default.aspx