PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper

PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper

PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper

Research Paper Proposals

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper
From $8/Page
Order Essay

Throughout the program, you should be thinking of a research topic you would like to explore. In the capstone course (PSY-693), you will create a research proposal. To assist you in the creation of that proposal, you will decide on a research topic and begin collecting empirical studies to support the need for research. Your topic must relate to a basic social psychological principle; however it can fall into one of the applied subfields (forensic psychology, psychology of religion, industrial organization, health psychology, etc.).

For this assignment you will create your research question and at least five scholarly, peer reviewed, empirical studies, all from the past 5 to 7 years. Your articles must support the need for your research.

The following information will assist in the formation of your research question and the beginning collection of literature:

1. Use the empirical checklist (located in course materials) to assure your article is an empirical article.

2. Explore the Center for Innovation in Research and Teaching (cirt.gcu.edu) for information on research topics and literature reviews. From the main page, under Research Development – click on Research Ready. Each section has several bits of information to help formulate your research. Additionally on the right hand side under Development Resources, explore Research Tutorials. This section will assist you in creating your research questions and further information on literature reviews.

Get Help With Your Research Paper Assignment

If you need assistance with writing your research essay, our professional essay writing service is here to assist!

Prepare a document that includes your research question(s), including how your research will add to the current research in your chosen field. Your document will include five scholarly, peer reviewed, empirical studies from the past 5 to 7 years. This section should include APA formatted citations for each article, including permalink; additionally a short annotation for each article stating how the literature shows your research is needed.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a scoring guide. Please review the scoring guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper

Full Course Assignments GCU

Present an original research proposal in a 7-10-slide PowerPoint. Be prepared to defend your research as well as critique at least two learner’s presentations in the discussion forum.

Include the following in the presentation:

  1. Introduction (1 slide)
  2. Research Questions/Hypotheses (1 slide)
  3. Literature Review/Theory (1-2 slides)
  4. Methods & Data Collection (1-2 slides)
  5. Hypothetical Data Presentation/Findings (2-3 slides)
  6. Future research (1 slide)
  7. Conclusion (1 slide)

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: 4.2 Convey scientific knowledge to a general audience through a presentation.

Benchmark – Research Proposal PowerPoint Presentation

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
40.0 %Present and defend original research (Comp. 4.2)
Defense of Research is missing.
Defense of Research is vague.
Defense of Research is adequate.
Defense of Research is thought out with some current scholarly research.
Defense of Research is concise and thorough with current scholarly research.
30.0 %Presentation of Content
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
10.0 %Layout
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Attached is the “Peer Review Worksheet” you will use to review the proposal of a colleague in the discussion forum. You will turn one copy of the completed worksheet in here for your instructor to grade; the other you will attach in the discussion forum for your peer to view.

Attach the file with your completed Peer Review Worksheet to the Peer Review Forum Activity as a “reply” to the initial post of your peer’s first draft. Do not post the worksheet as an attachment.

Topic 3 Peer Review Forum Activity

Review the proposal of the person who posted his/her proposal directly below yours in the Peer Review Forum Activity. If your proposal is the last posted, review the first proposal posted. Complete the “Peer Review Worksheet” (attached under the assignment tab). You will then need to post your completed Peer Review Worksheet to TWO places: to the Topic 3 Peer Review Forum Activity for your peer to view, as well as to the Topic 3 Peer Review of Research Proposal assignment box, so the instructor can grade your work.

Attach the file with your completed Peer Review Worksheet to the Peer Review Forum Activity as a “reply” to the initial post of your peer’s first draft. Do not post the worksheet as an attachment.

PSY 693 Module 5 Benchmark Assignment – Career Exploration/Short Research Paper 

Details:

Research two or three career paths of interest in your prospective field. In 750-1,000 words, include the following:

  1. Labor market and availability (e.g., location)
  2. Income range
  3. Education/training needed
  4. Job availability
  5. Future stability
  6. Time Demands
  7. Benefits
  8. Challenges (e.g., burnout propensity)
  9. Opportunities for advancement
  10. Does it match your skill level?
  11. Does it align with your personality? Value system?
  12. Summarize which path best suits you and your career choices. Explain why.
  13. Discuss any surprising factors surrounding the career paths of your prospective field.

At least two to three scholarly sources are required for this assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide and Typing Template, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: 4.4. Research based professional career goals 

Benchmark Assignment – Career Exploration/Short Research Paper  

  1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content  
15.0 %Discuss the marketability of the career, including; labor market and availability, income range, education/training needed, job availability, future stability, and time demands from the career. Discussion of the marketability of the career, including; labor market and availability, income range, education/training needed, job availability, future stability, and time demands from the career is missing. Discussion of the marketability of the career, including; labor market and availability, income range, education/training needed, job availability, future stability, and time demands from the career is vague or inconsistent. Discussion of the marketability of the career, including; labor market and availability, income range, education/training needed, job availability, future stability, and time demands from the career is present but lacks some clarity or quality. Discussion of the marketability of the career, including; labor market and availability, income range, education/training needed, job availability, future stability, and time demands from the career is present and is clearly understood. Shows quality analysis of the topics. Discussion of the marketability of the career, including; labor market and availability, income range, education/training needed, job availability, future stability, and time demands from the career is exceptional. Clearly conveys a thorough grasp of the topics.
15.0 %Discuss career benefits and challenges, including; burnout propensity and opportunities for advancement. Discussion of career benefits and challenges, including; burnout propensity and opportunities for advancement is missing. Discussion of career benefits and challenges, including; burnout propensity and opportunities for advancement is vague or inconsistent. PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper Discussion of career benefits and challenges, including; burnout propensity and opportunities for advancement is present but lacks some clarity or quality. Discussion of career benefits and challenges, including; burnout propensity and opportunities for advancement is clearly understood and makes some connection to current research. Discussion of career benefits and challenges, including; burnout propensity and opportunities for advancement is exceptional and uses examples from current research, not simply personal opinions.
15.0 %Discuss how career matches your skill set, your personality, and your values system. Discussion of how career matches skill set, personality, and values system is missing. Discussion of how career matches skill set, personality, and values system is vague and inadequate. Discussion of how career matches skill set, personality, and values system is present but lacks some clarity. Discussion of how career matches skill set, personality, and values system is present and well thought out. Discussion of how career matches skill set, personality, and values system is comprehensive, concise and thoughtful.
15.0 %Summarize which career path is best suited to you and your career choice, including why it is best suited. (Comp 4.4)  Summary of career path best suited to you and your career choice, including why it is best suited is missing. Summary of career path best suited to you and your career choice, including why it is best suited is vague and inconsistent. Summary of career path best suited to you and your career choice, including why it is best suited is present but lacks some clarity. Summary of career path best suited to you and your career choice, including why it is best suited is clear and appropriate with relevant details. Summary of career path best suited to you and your career choice, including why it is best suited is comprehensive, thoughtful, and shows sound analysis of personal situation.
10.0 %Discuss any surprising factors discovered surrounding your career path. Discussion of surprising factors discovered surrounding your career path is missing. Discussion of surprising factors discovered surrounding your career path is vague and inadequate. Discussion of surprising factors discovered surrounding your career path is present but lacks some clarity. Discussion of surprising factors discovered surrounding your career path is clear and thoughtful. Discussion of surprising factors discovered surrounding your career path is concise, comprehensive, and shows sound analysis.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format  
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Topic 7 Benchmark Assignment – Leadership Reflection Paper 

Details:

NOTE: Please review the attached document Leadership Reflection, located under course materials, before beginning this assignment.

In 500-750 words reflect on what you learned from your leadership interview.

  1. Describe what you learned from your interview.
  2. Describe how you will use the information in your own leadership experiences.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide and Typing Template, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: 2.4: Evaluate intrapersonal skills.

Get Help With Your Research Paper Assignment

If you need assistance with writing your research essay, our professional essay writing service is here to assist!

Benchmark Assignment – Leadership Reflection Paper  

  1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content  
35.0 %Describe what you learned from your interview Description of what was learned from the interview is missing. Description of what was learned from the interview is vague or inadequate. Description of what was learned from the interview is present but somewhat lacks clarity. Description of what was learned from the interview is clear and thoughtful.

PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper

Description of what was learned from the interview is clear, thorough, and well-presented.
35.0 %Describe how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences. (Comp 2.4)  Description of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is missing. Description of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is vague or inadequate. Description of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is present but somewhat lacks clarity. Description of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is clear and thoughtful. Description of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is clear, thorough, and well-presented.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format  
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. PSY693 Social Psychology Discussion Assignment Paper Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

 

Full satisfaction or return your money back

Our experts will write you a top-quality paper and revise it an unlimited number of times until you're 100% satisfied - or offer a refund.

Check Prices
Get the best discount and better grades here
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know that being a student these days is hard. Because of this, our prices are some of the lowest on the market.

Instead, we offer perks, discounts, and free services to enhance your experience.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
How to get the most out of your experience with Toptutor4me
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Here is what our happy clients say about us.
Receiving customer feedback and reviews from legit students who have utilized our services is one of our favorite part of the job. We love seeing testimonials from happy students whom we have helped to succeed. Read through the below review page to see what our partners think.
English 101
I would like to thank you for the writing, it was a very busy week for me and had no time this week to do a writing. I would recommend you to others and would utilize you again.
Customer 452639, October 16th, 2022
English 101
na
Customer 452547, March 22nd, 2022
Communications
You're awesome! Thank you so much!
Customer 452483, July 27th, 2021
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Thank you so much for all of your hard work! Appreciate it all!
Customer 452483, November 14th, 2021
Nursing
Excellent. Thank you.
Customer 452487, August 26th, 2021
Communications
Well done! I thank you very much!
Customer 452483, July 9th, 2021
Sociology
Thank you so much! Appreciate it!
Customer 452483, November 8th, 2021
Mathematics
Thank you, great work!
Customer 452483, July 19th, 2021
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Perfect! Thank you for also remembering to highlight the necessary words. Appreciate all of your help and hard work!
Customer 452483, November 7th, 2021
Introduction to Sociology
Thank you very much for all of your hard work!
Customer 452483, October 15th, 2021
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Perfect! Thank you so much for all of your help!
Customer 452483, October 31st, 2021
Nursing
Good job. Thank you
Customer 452487, September 16th, 2021
11,595
Total Reviews
98%
Satsfaction rate
6 pages
Average paper length
40%
Customers referred by a friend
Enjoy the best prices and lifetime 15% discount
Use a coupon TOP15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat